Swamp Thing 3.39: Who Henches the Henchman?

To recap, here’s what we know about Dr. Alec Holland’s bio-restorative formula: It’s the result of experiments in merging animal cells with plant cells. Dr. Holland was hoping to develop plants that have an animal’s aggressive power for survival; he wanted tomatoes that can grow in the desert. Personally, I don’t think world hunger is the tomatoes’ fault, but Alec thought we ought to have some, just in case.

So far, we’ve seen the formula work three times:

#1) Some drops that fell on the pine floor made the floorboards sprout new branches.

#2) A little bit of formula mixed into a beaker made an orchid grow into a full tree in less than a day.

#3) A human who was soaked in the formula, set on fire and thrown into the swamp turned into an unholy mud zombie made of moss and fury and Latin names for things.

You’ll notice that all three of those were topical uses, and all of them involved the formula interacting with plant matter. But now Arcane, the presumed-dead megalomaniac cult leader, thinks that he should gulp down a big glass of it and it’ll do something exciting to him, and I honestly can not imagine where he got that idea.

I mean, Arcane is currently standing in front of what I assume is supposed to be his Board of Directors, celebrating the exciting scientific breakthrough that he just stole from somebody else. But instead of trying the formula out on a plant, where it belongs, he’s decided to have somebody swallow it and see what happens.

This is like the CEO of a promising startup saying that he’s developed a new, innovative technology that will make the company the undisputed leader in global food production and distribution — but first, I’m going to swallow it and see if I turn into a really strong monster!

It’s bananas. It doesn’t make sense, and it doesn’t connect to anything that’s happened over the last three-quarters of the movie. It completely wastes the whole concept of a sentient plant monster vs a greedy industrialist, and it reduces the climax of the movie to a silly, pointless, low-stakes swordfight between two guys in rubber suits.

If anyone ever tells you that the problem with the way that Swamp Thing ends is the terrible Arcane monster costume, then they are incorrect. The terrible Arcane monster costume is certainly a problem, but the plot pivot about drinking the formula is the problem.

Bruno’s transformation dance experience is gross and unsettling in a way that’s not really that much fun to watch. He just sits there and shudders and suffers, while everyone else looks on with mild interest. Nobody offers to help him, or looks at Arcane in a way that indicates that they hold him responsible. These are gross people and I’m tired of looking at them.

And then Bruno goes and turns into the wrong thing, which is annoying and probably Bill Munns’ fault. Here’s what the script calls for:

WIDER SHOT REVEALS Bruno, or what once was Bruno. But now he has altered. What was his nose is now an elongated proboscis, half-root, half-tendril. His eyes have sunken into knots, his hair turned to seagrass and his mouth opened to a LOW, TERRIFIED GROAN from his mossy lungs.

Don’t panic! I’m sure it’s only
temporary. Don’t panic —

REVERSE ANGLE. Bruno is still changing. His arms are like roots. His clothes are splitting and falling away. We see his torso is covered with a ragged bark-like substance. Next moment Bruno teeters backwards and falls as helplessly as a felled redwood.

According to that description, Bruno was supposed to turn into a plant creature, which still wouldn’t make sense but it’s better than the thing that they actually did.

So in this startling moment of ludicrous transmutation, I might as well take the opportunity to talk about alchemy.

Alchemy is an ancient proto-scientific tradition practiced in medieval Europe, China and India by people who’d figured out maybe two-fifths of the scientific method, and then just started heating things up to see if they’d explode. The alchemists’ goal was to create something perfect out of imperfect materials — turning base metals into gold, concocting an elixir of immortality, creating a panacea that could cure any disease, or inventing a perpetually burning lamp. Some of them may have been kidding.

Now, you might wonder why somebody would spend their short, miserable medieval life shut indoors — making a lot of smoke, peering at things and jotting tiny, crabbed notes in their own personal cypher about the things that they weren’t achieving — just to invent gold, which already existed. But for the alchemists, it wasn’t a business venture; it was a spiritual enterprise.

You see, alchemists believed that the universe operated in layers, and changes at one scale would produce similar changes at the other scales. The movement of the stars corresponded to the activity and fate of human beings, and they could also be mapped onto the workings of the human body, and the uses of minerals from the earth. The concept is summed up in the phrase “as above, so below”, and if you could unlock the mysteries of lead and copper and sulphur and mercury, then you would have mastery over the body, the soul, the heavens and the state. I don’t know where people get these ideas, but that’s what they thought.

So discovering how to change iron into gold would mean that you’ve cracked the secret of how to turn something common into something perfect, and this purifying change on the physical plane would correspond to a purification of the soul. We could all live forever — free of disease, error or sin — and all we have to do is figure out the magic recipe.

As it turns out, the alchemists never quite cracked it, and over several centuries, their devoted attention resulted in three things — medicine, gunpowder and failure.

So that explains the dialogue that follows, if anything will.

Arcane:  We followed the notebooks religiously. There can be no margin for error! Why doesn’t Bruno there have your strength?

Swamp Thing:  Because… he never had it.

Arcane:  No riddles, please.

Swamp Thing:  You don’t understand. There’s nothing hidden… no secrets. The formula works in so simple a way. What Bruno took was what changed me. It only amplifies your essence. It simply makes you more… of what you already are.

Arcane:  Bruno’s essence was stupidity… timidity. The formula simply extended, amplified this to ridiculous forms and proportions. He shrank! He shrank to what he actually was. But if the essence is, let us say… genius! Then this genius should be monumental in body as well as in spirit. Is that what you’re saying?

Well, no, probably, because none of that means anything, but if it helps you get through the scene, then sure.

The idea, according to this soggy medieval superhero movie, is that the bio-restorative formula has a spiritual dimension as well as a physical one. It responds to intention and mentality, judging the worth of a man’s soul and then embodying that essential truth in flesh and fiber.

Alec is a nice person, and he cares about people and nature, so the formula turns him into a well-meaning plant monster. Arcane is a bad person, and he only cares about power, so the magic potion will respond to that, and turn him into a destructive animal monster. You’ll notice that they’re still both monsters, so if you were to come across the two of them without knowing who’s who, it wouldn’t be immediately obvious which one of them is getting rewarded, and which one is being punished.

This apparently doesn’t purify anything — Alec says that the process just takes the base metal of what you’ve already got, and makes it even more so. So that’s another L for the alchemists, I’m afraid, but after all these centuries I suppose they’re used to it.

We return to my favorite character!
3.40: The Unconcluded Caramel Kane


— Danny Horn

11 thoughts on “Swamp Thing 3.39: Who Henches the Henchman?

  1. Bruno assists Alec and Alice against Arcane after his transformation so maybe he was trickier and more mischievous than Arcane realized. I never thought of him as timid or stupid, though I wasn’t sure if leaving the locket for Alec to find was meant as kindness or bait. Bruno still appears the most human of the three transformations, though it’s probably due to lack of a reasonable movie budget and not anything about his essence.
    Was Arcane supposed to also become plant-like in the original script?

    Liked by 4 people

  2. Ah, alchemy; the Learn As You Go Then Immediately Forget Again science!

    I mean, transforming one element into another is pretty simple in theory once you grasp the table of elements, and it happens naturally as well, or we wouldn’t have found and started messing around with nuclear power.

    But it’s amazing how humans never, ever, categorically refuse to learn that we don’t want purity. Purity, to us, is boring and wimpy, and there’s nowhere to go from there. There’s a reason for all those jokes about heaven being boring and hell having all the best songs.

    What we want, of course, is power. Whether it’s all the gold we can spend or immortality or telling the spheres of heaven to play some rockin’ Top 40 at our personal whim, we want power. It makes us feel safe, but it’s a safety that isn’t dull. Finally we won’t be at the mercy of anything, hooray! Just babes and stripper parties and swamp mansions all the livelong day!

    But of course we blow it every single time, either through hubris or sheer laziness and impatience, like not reading, or just ignoring, the part of the notebook that says “NOT FOR INTERNAL USE, WILL SHRINK YOU INTO RAT MONSTER.” And we get bored with our little versions of perfection as quickly as we do everything else.

    The movie’s version of alchemy is a muddy, tannic water sludge, but it actually captures the human response to the idea of perfection really well.

    Liked by 5 people

    1. But if it said WILL TURN YOU INTO PIGWEASEL who could resist?
      Curiosity will lure you in every time. The end of the world will probably come from someone saying, “I wonder what would happen if I did this?”

      Liked by 4 people

      1. I’m now picturing Arcane watching Bruno’s transformation and saying to one of his surviving henchmen, “Hold my beer.”

        And if you’re one of his henchmen and you see what he’s done to Bruno, why do you hang around? You might be next. Or do you bide your time thinking that he’s about to do something stupid that will bring about his defeat and then you’ll be free? With maybe a little looting of the mansion on your way out.

        Liked by 2 people

  3. We’re back at Frankenstein again. What you create may have the motivation and the power to destroy you, even when you were trying to do something nice for the world.

    It’s a little more complicated here, because Arcane is the one getting destroyed, but it’s his own fault.

    This may be a little late, but did anyone else notice the similarity between the posters for Swamp Thing and Creature from the Black Lagoon? Compare and contrast.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. I don’t think I want to know what Arcane is doing to SwampAlec in that fourth still… Just look at the expression on dirty Uncle Anton’s face. Yipes!


  5. There’s a generalized misconception of what “alchemy” is due to some missing information about where the term comes from.

    In an of itself, “alchemy” is an extension of orientalist thinking that denoted that any science not developed by Europe during the medieval era must be supernatural and thus hokey. The reality is that the term “alchemy” comes from the Arabic “al khamiyya”, which in turns comes from the Greek Khemy, which takes its origin in the black sands of Khem (now Egypt).

    In other words: It’s chemistry presented as sorcery in order to discredit any advancements made before the Enlightenment, by a collection of peoples whose contributions to the modern sciences are still being ignored by modern Europeans and North Americans. It would do us all some good to look back at the history of the world as taught and recognize the missing knowledge, rather than resort to the still popular perception that “alchemy” was a false science.


    1. (I can’t seem to find an edit button so addendum)

      I realize the following could have been phrased better:
      It’s chemistry presented as sorcery in order to discredit any advancements made before the Enlightenment, by a collection of peoples whose contributions to the modern sciences are still being ignored by modern Europeans and North Americans.

      It should have read as:
      It’s chemistry presented as sorcery in order to discredit any advancements made by a collection of peoples whose contributions to the modern sciences are still being ignored by modern Europeans and North Americans.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s