Now, if it were entirely up to me, I’d probably stop writing about this Lex Luthor scene at some point, rather than natter on endlessly about it, but I can’t help it; there are larger market forces at play.
Richard Donner ended this scene with Luthor and his sidekick Otis saying in unison, “What more could anyone ask?” But, as it turned out, people did want to ask for more — specifically, the Salkinds, who wanted more money from television sales. TV networks wanted to air Superman, and they were happy to have as much of it as possible, to fill up programming time and justify more commercial breaks. They were willing to pay by the minute, so the Salkinds prepared what’s now called the Extended Cut, taking a 143-minute movie and stretching it out to 188 minutes.
Most of the extra material is just useless filler — slightly longer scenes, extra reaction shots, second-unit footage — all the stuff that was properly cut out the first time, and adds nothing to the experience except making things take longer. But there are a handful of actual deleted scenes, like Krypton’s tinfoil science cop, who exploded before accomplishing anything.
There’s also another two minutes of this introductory Luthor scene, which aren’t necessary but offer several items of interest. If you don’t mind, I’m going to give you the whole scene, and then we can discuss it.
Luthor: It’s a pity that he didn’t see from such humble beginnings how I’ve created this empire.
Eve: An empire? This?
Luthor: Miss Teschmacher, how many girls do you know who have a Park Avenue address like this one?
Eve: Park Avenue address? Two hundred feet below?
Luthor: Do you realize what people are shelling out up there, for a few miserable rooms off a common elevator?
Luthor and Otis (in unison): What more could anyone ask?
Eve: Sunshine? A night on the town, instead of under it?
(There are sinister growls from the other side of the room. Otis takes a couple casual steps in the opposite direction.)
Luthor (quietly): Otis…
Luthor: Did you feed the babies?
(More terrifying growls and snarls.)
Otis: N-not today, Mr. Luthor. (He takes another step away.)
Luthor: Otis… feed the babies.
Otis: Mr. Luthor, please.
Luthor (raising his voice): Otis!
(Eve gasps. Lex waits impatiently as Otis cracks his knuckles, and walks to the steel door. Luthor crosses to the piano.)
Luthor (to Eve): Relax.
(Otis presses a button that raises the corrugated steel door. He holds his nose as the opening reveals a purple, steaming pit. More growls from the pit. Otis enters the room, balancing on a thin platform. He waves his hat at the creatures below as they snarl at him.)
(Leaning against the piano, Eve grimaces. Lex sits down and begins to play some soothing dinner music.)
(Standing on the platform, Otis manipulates a chain that lowers a huge raw side of beef down from the ceiling. The monsters hungrily devour the meal. Lex pays no attention.)
(Finally, Otis hauls on the chain and pulls up the bones, stripped of flesh.)
Otis (calling to Lex): The babies were hungry, Mr. Luthor!
Eve (turning to Lex): You are sick. You are really sick.
Eve: You would take a diaper pin to cut a baby’s throat. You’d fix the brakes on your own grandmother’s wheelchair.
(Lex smiles, taking this as a compliment.)
Eve: I don’t know. Just explain one thing to me, Lex… (She reaches out a hand across the piano.) Why do I love you so much?
Luthor (grinning): Because life with me is never dull. (He lightly touches her hand.)
(Encouraged, she walks around the piano to stand behind him.)
Eve: No. No, it’s never dull, Lex. (She puts her arms around him.) Because you are the pits. You are really the pits.
(She starts to cuddle and stroke him. He gets turned off by the affection, and starts scanning the newspaper.)
So that’s the scene. Now, it’s pretty clear why this was cut from the film; it’s not funny. The scene in the theatrical cut is a three-minute high-energy comedy routine with Lex at the center of the action, as the sidekicks feed him straight lines to react to.
But all of a sudden, Lex goes quiet, and starts playing the piano. For more than a minute, he only says one word. I suppose the idea is to show that Lex is mercurial, and can shift moods on a dime, but that’s not a characteristic that makes the movie more interesting, so it needs to go.
And then there’s the babies. I can see what they’re trying to do — he’s a Bond villain, so he needs an over-the-top hazard in his lair that he can throw people into — but it’s only funny intellectually. There’s no moment in that minute-long routine where an audience would actually laugh; you realize from the start that Otis will be throwing meat at monsters, and it plays out exactly as you would expect. You might smile at the funny faces that Otis makes, or the sight of the carcass’ skeleton returning to view, but that’s about it.
Now, this introduction of the babies is supposed to pay off at the end of the movie, in another deleted Extended Cut scene that I actually think is worthwhile. Furious at Eve for betraying him, Lex dangles her over the pit, and intends to drop her to a messy death — but at the last moment, Superman appears, saving Eve and taking the other two miscreants into custody. It’s a nice moment that wraps up Eve’s storyline, so I wish they’d been able to use it — but to do that, they’d need to keep the “feed the babies” scene as well, and it’s not worth it.
The other item of interest is that this is the only time in the film where it’s explicit that there’s a romantic connection between Lex and Eve. She spends the rest of the movie criticizing him relentlessly, and a moment of actual affection makes her presence in the lair more explicable. It’s also interesting to see how uncomfortable Lex is with that expression of affection, which explains why he insists on calling her “Miss Teschmacher” all the time. It also resonates nicely with the mention of his unhappy relationship with his father; Lex has clearly cut himself off from normal human relationships.
So that’s interesting, but it requires Lex to sit still and look uncomfortable, which slows down the movie and isn’t funny. Overall, it’s nice to see this scene as an example of the good decisions they made in the editing room, but including it in a version of the film that they actually showed to people is kind of a mean trick.
And with that, I believe that I’ve finally said everything that I have to say about this sequence, and we are excused. Tomorrow, we’ll move forward to… well, backwards to 1974, actually, and then 1913 after that. Still, there’s always Monday.
Why Luthor’s costume didn’t catch on
in the comic books and cartoons…
1.49: The Look of Luthor
— Danny Horn
11 thoughts on “Superman 1.48: Feed the Babies”
I think the nature of Lex and Miss Teschmacher’s relationship is clear enough. His kink requires him to call her “Miss Teschmacher.” That can make an audience laugh if he just throws it in their face for a couple of seconds at a time, but if you have to stop and think about it instantly stops being funny.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I really do think the makers of the movie were self-conscious about the workplace themed kinks of the leading characters, and that they meant for the grownups in the audience to have fun with them. I come back to this because of a recent Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal cartoon that explains Clark Kent as Superman’s vehicle for living out his workplace-humiliation fetish: https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/secret-identity
You really do have to wonder how Superman puts up with being belittled and rejected by Lois over and over, and never shows frustration. I had the thought a while ago, looking at the old comic panels that Danny was posting, that it’s almost like Superman enjoys the game of pretending to be a luckless nerd. The dynamic between the characters of Clark and Lois may have changed to be more respectful at a certain point in Superman history (maybe by the ’80s?) but back in the day, Clark really didn’t get no respect.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The comics are for boys who are afraid of girls and believe that the Lois/ Clark relationship is what’s in store for them as heterosexual men. The movie speaks to that audience as well, but grownups can look at Clark/ Lois next to Lex/ Miss Teschmacher and catch a joke.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think they should have left it in. When your movie is already 143 minutes, what’s another 3 minutes? Eve’s reason for staying with Lex is never explained otherwise. I never got that she was in love with him. She criticizes constantly and he doesn’t even call her by her first name. The idea that she knows exactly what he is and loves him anyway would make her rescuing Superman read a bit differently. When Lex threatens her mother, her eyes are opened. She realizes what a fool she’s been and kissing Superman could be a sign of her moving on from Lex, though still feeling unworthy of a nice guy. Instead she seems to betray a guy she didn’t like anyway and her hesitation to help Superman is based on fear. If I had known she was in love with Lex, her betrayal would have seemed more significant for her character. Plus her fate is unknown at the end of the movie. I assumed either Superman let her go or couldn’t find her because she ran away. It would have been nice to have some closure for the character. Eve seems to have only been in the movie as a plot device. Her character is one big question mark. This scene would have at least answered one question.
LikeLiked by 5 people
I assumed Eve was there as a kind of Straight Buffer–otherwise you had two men living together and that would NOT have been okayed at the time, no matter how crazed the one or goofy and bumbling the other. About the only time a Mad Whomever was allowed only one sidekick was in the Universal Frankenstein, and even then they established that Victor was engaged to a lady from about ten minutes in.
It was especially clever putting the title FEED THE BABIES, directly below the picture of Valerie Perrine’s massive mammaries.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yep, she’s just about dressed for it.
LikeLiked by 3 people
The more I think about “the babies”, the more questions I have! 🤔
LikeLiked by 2 people
My memory of the movie is fuzzy, but going by your capable description of it so far, these two deleted scenes would have made Lex more fittingly menacing, as well as properly explaining Eve’s place in the story, as Mary mentioned. Is it possible that these scenes were considered “going too far” for a wide audience in 1978? Both the dialogue in the first scene and the attempt at gruesome murder in the second scene? Then again, they used the extended cut for TV later on, so maybe not.
i think theres a few other reasons why they took the scenes out, particularly the last one.. lex is mean but hes not THAT Mean. see how many times theyve mucked up his plans before but he still keeps them around. even though they can be inept.. well mainly otis, lol, he still needs followers so he carries on tolerating them. it seems out of character he would have decided to kill off one of his sidekicks. he might have punished her in some way but ultimately he needs them around still after.
plus if lex had gone as far as to try and kill her then it would have made less sense why she helped luthor to escape from prison in the second movie..